The Copyright (Amendment) Act,
2012 - kanta laga for Remix barons
(The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 as notified in
official gazette on 08th June, 2012)
The chaos of ‘kanta laga’ has been over but the beat
has been listened by the Government very deeply. In latest amendment we can see
a complete wrath over the remixes or technically the version recordings flourished
in India.
The time of
2003 – 2010 has witnessed a sheer pressure of remixes in Indian music
industries, where the singers have declared the remix version as the near nude
dancers and remixes said we added masala to
the song.
The remixes, termed as “version
recordings” meant by a sound recording made of any already published song by
using another voice or voices and with different musicians and arrangers.
Version recording is thus neither copying not reproduction of the original
recordings. [See Gramophone Co. of India v. Super
Cassettes Industries Ltd., 1996 PTC(16)].
The only
remedy available with the original musicians are available is the compliance of
condition under Section 52 (1)(j) (prior
to the amendments) which were not more than the formalities required under
Copyright Act, 1957. In other words,
judiciary has nodded indirectly to the remixes.
However, in
the Copyright (Amendment) Ac, 2012 new Section
31C has been inserted keeping in view to protect the right of the musicians
and singers and to curb the infringement of copyright through the version recordings/remixes.
The
important aspects of Section 31C are as follows:
1.
Consent or
license from the owner of the right in any literary, dramatic or musical work
and the cover version shall be in same medium as was lastly used until the
medium has been outdated in commercial use.
2.
Prior
written notice to the owner for version recording is required and the royalty
shall be paid in advance at the rate as specified by the Copyright Board and
for a minimum of 50000 copies.
3.
A cover version
cannot be reproduced until the expiration of 5 years from the date it was
actually made.
4.
Cover
version shall have to mention that it is a cover version and shall not contain
he name or depict in anyway any performer of an earlier sound recording of the
same work or any cinematographic film in which such recording was incorporated.
5.
A person
cannot make any alteration in the literary or musical work which has not been
made previously by or with consent of the actual owner of the rights.
6. Alteration
in original recordings are only allowed for technical purpose now, however,
previously it was allowed for adaption of the work.
The
amendment on one hand has protected the original owners and on other hand
restricted the Kolaveri singers to get outshine in one day….
can you clarify if remixes would fall within Section: 31(C) of the Copyright Act. Many thanks. Neelima
ReplyDeleteYes, in fact the intent of law is to stop the unauthorized remake and remixes. Remix are subject to royalty.
Deleteyes, remixes will fall under this category. Actually the intent of law is to prevent unauthorized remix of musicians
ReplyDelete