Saturday, 30 March 2013

Steve Jobs as Trademark!!!

TRADEMARKS!!!

Steve Jobs! a reputed name who give strength to Apple Inc. and also promoted the i-phone series all over the world.

Anyways, a trademark application has been filed in Turkey for claiming his name as the Trademark for Clothing .... However, the registration is under process.

Some countries with their specific laws prohibit such application to use the name as the trademark without its consent. It will be good to see about the same in Turkey!!!

Lets try for Billy name as TM application :)

Google new invention!!!

DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMAGE CAPTURE DEVICE USING WEATHER INFORMATION 

It doesn't matter you are a good photographer or not!!! Google find a new way to capture pics from your android and it will adjust the hue, light, saturation as per the weather conditions.

In  the latest patent published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, filed by Google Inc., a claim for the system for capturing image using weather information has been applied. Patent Application No. 20130076926 published by the USPTO dated 28th March, 2013 claims patent over a device which use the GPS co-ordinates and obtain the necessary weather information. 

The device will adjust the camera as per the geo-co-ordinates in order to take a perfect snap for your FB. 

It is a method for capturing an image using an image capture device equipped with a processor. The method includes receiving an electromagnetic signal transmitted from a remote station, determining a location of the image capture device based on the received electromagnetic signal, establishing communication over a network between the image capture device and a remote server, transmitting a request to the remote server for weather information pertaining to the determined location; receiving the weather information, determining an ambient lighting value based on the weather information, capturing an image using the image capture device, and processing the captured image using the determined ambient lighting value.

Click Here to check the detail for the patent application.

Well now don't ask if it will work in your home too.... :)

Thursday, 28 March 2013

Copyright Rules, 2013 - Provisions


Important provisions in Copyright Rules, 2013

With the initiation of the Copyright Rules, 2013 the Government has made it clear that the laws are not going to be easy for the copycats and the performers shall prevail over the original ideas. If we compare the two copyright laws or in other words if it is New vs. Old then the new rules are much clear with spirit or law and interpretation thereto. The important provisions inserted by the Copyright Rules are as follows:


1)      Appointment of Advocates as members of Copyright Board: The constitution of Copyright Board has been changed under Section 3 and a good news for the legal practitioners that they are eligible to be appointed as the Members of the Copyright Board.

    a)      Any person having eligibility as follows can be appointed as the member of the Copyright Board:             

i)        is or has been a member of the Indian Legal Service and has held a post in Grade-I of that service for at least three years; or
ii)       has, for at least ten years, held a judicial office; or
iii)     is or has been a Member of a Tribunal or Civil Service not below the rank of a Joint Secretary to the Government of India with three years' experience in the field of Copyright; or

iv)    has, for at least ten years, been an advocate of a proven specialized experience in Copyright Law;

2)      Relinquishments of Copyrights: Unlike the old Rules the new copyright has specified proper procedure for the relinquishment of Copyright. As per new rules the copyright can be relinquished by two ways:
i)        File Form I with the Registrar; or
ii)       Make public notice for the same.

3)      Compulsory License: Government of India notified Section 31A, 31B, 31C, 31D for compulsory license to end the monopoly of copyright owner related with the copyrighted work. Earlier only Section 31 was a single way for the compulsory license in work withheld from public. Insertion of new section has made it category specific and apart from Section 31, compulsory licenses can be obtained for specific purposes also.

   a)      Rule 8 read with Section 31A: Compulsory License To Publish Or Communicate To The Public The Work Or Translation Thereof:
In the case of any published or unpublished wok is:
·         Withheld from pubic; or
·         Author is dead or unknown or can’t be traced
Then any person can apply to the Copyright for compulsory license to republish the work. However, the Board shall give opportunity of being heard to the original owner and shall grant royalties thereto.

   b)       Rule 14 read with Section 31B: Compulsory License For Benefit Of Disabled:

Any person working for benefit of person with disability for profit or business purposes may apply to the Board for compulsory license to republish the work in any format which is usable for the disable persons.
Examples: Converting a book published into Brail format.

The Copyright Board consist discretion to provide opportunity of being heard to the original owner.

     c)       The whip over the Remix: Rule 20 read with Section 31C: Statutory License For Cover Versions:
A new initiative taken by the Government to control the unethical reproduction of OLD GOLD as new foul remix. Chapter VII explains the mode and method under which a person may apply for compulsory license to reproduce the old wine in new bottle.

Copyright Rule, 2013 not only provides the procedure but set the standards and guidelines for reproducing the song. Apart from the old Rules now the compulsory license s required whereas no such requirement was there in old rules.

     d)      Rule 29 read with Section 31D: Statutory License For Broadcasting Of Literary And Musical Works And Sound Recording:
Copyright Rules are now stringent for Copyrighted work and broadcasting thereof. The broadcasting organization shall not only take compulsory license but also pay the royalty as well as keep records of the broadcasting made.

4)      Copyright Societies

The Copyright Board has inserted new provisions for registration and administration of the Copyright Societies.  Copyright Societies are the organization who regulates the work of Literature, Artistic and Musical Works. Now the Copyright Societies have to follow the code of conduct as mentioned under the new rules and each society have to display the Tariff Scheme to the public.

New Copyright Rules have concentrated on the online filing of the application but as of date no such facilities has been started. It is likely to be started by this year.






[i] Amendment made by Act 27 of 2012, sec. 18 (w.e.f. 21st June, 2012 vide S.O. 1393(E), dated 20th June, 2012


Note: The highlight  mentioned above is taken from the Copyright Rules, 2013 as notified by the Government. The laws are subject to amendments may be  made from time to time. Author shall not be  liable for any action taken solely based upon the content produced here.

Sunday, 24 March 2013

Protective mechanism for Mobiles - Invention


You love your Apple® but alas dropped it!!!

Indeed you have purchased your first Apple i-phone® or tabs but alas unknowingly have dropped it. Those who love their apple device have good news. The patent application filed by the Apple Inc. consist a protective mechanism to save your most delicious apple from getting thrashed.

As per the application published by United States Patent and Trademark Office on 21st March, 2013, a Protective Mechanism for an Electronic Device has been filed by the Apple. The application has claimed the patent over a mechanism in which the device will configure the rate and speed of falling and will smartly take protective measures to avoid maximum damages.

However, it will be good to see in apparatus. Till date no electronic device by apple has such protective mechanism.

Nicholas King and Fletcher Rothkopf have invented this new mechanism and filed the patent through the patent application 20130073095 which was originally filed in 2011.

For the detailed mechanism and application of patent by Apple visit the following link:



Note: The Apple® or Apple Inc. ® used here are the property of the Apple Inc. ®. Author or any of its associate does not claim, directly or indirectly, any commercial interest of whatsoever in nature in any intellectual property rights. The name has been used for the information purposes only.

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

Amendment in Trademark Application


Amendments not accepted by the Trademark Department

To err is human that’s why legislation contains some provisions for the rectification thereto. Trademark Act, provides for the amendment in the Trademark application and the rectification of the clerical error therein. However, certain errors which cannot be amended/altered are as follows:
  1.               Amendment which shall change the description of goods/services and causes to change Class.
  2.               Amendment which result in substantial change in the mark/brand name/logo itself.
  3.               Change in name of person who has applied for the registration.
  4.               Change of Class.


For any clarification get back to the author or post query at naveeen4567.shreel@gmail.com.

Friday, 15 March 2013

Jurisdiction of Trademark


JURISDICTION OF OFFICES OF THE TRADE MARKS REGISTRY

(vide Government of India Gazette Notification, dated 25.11.1959, 28.6.1960 and 21.8.1990 and further amendments thereto).


The Trade Marks Registry has its Head Office at Mumbai and branch Offices at Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai and Ahmadabad having territorial jurisdiction on a zonal basis as under:

Mumbai :
Office of the Trade Marks Registry at S. M. Road,
Near Antop Hill, Head Post Office,
Mumbai-400037.
Tel: 022-24101144, 24101177, 24148251, 24112211.
Fax : 22- 24140808.
Jurisdiction of Mumbai Head Office: The State of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Goa.


Ahmadabad:
Office of the Trade Marks Registry at Ahmadabad,
15/27, National Chambers,
1st floor, Ashram Road,
Ahmedabad-380 009.
Tel: 079-6580567/6587193. Fax: 079-6586763.
Jurisdiction of Ahmadabad Registry: The States of Gujarat and Rajasthan and the Union Territories of Daman, Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli.


Kolkata:
Office of the Trade Marks Registry,
Baudhik Sampada Bhavan
(I.P. Bhavan 5th floor) C.P. 2,
Sector V., Salt Lake,
Kolkata-91.
Tel: 033-2367731/23675975/23672848. Fax : 033-23675974.
Jurisdiction of Kolkata Registry: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tripura and Union Territories of Nagaland, Andaman & Nikobar Islands, Jharkhand.

 New Delhi:
Office of the Trade Marks Registry
Boudhik sampada bhavav, Plot No. 32,
Sector 14, Dwarka, New Delhi-110 075.
Tel.: 011-28082915/28082916/Fax : 28082917
Jurisdiction of New Delhi Registry: The States of Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh Delhi and the Union Territories of Chandigarh, Uttaranchal Pradesh.


Chennai:
Office of the Trade Marks Registry at Chennai,
Intellectual Property Rights bldg.,
Industrial Estate SIDCO RMD,
Godown Area G.S.T Road,
Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
Tel: 044-22322441/22322442/22322359 Fax : 044-22322441
 Jurisdiction of Chennai Registry: The States of Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and the Union Territories of Pondicherry and Lakshadweep Island. 

Thursday, 14 March 2013

Remix and The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012


The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 - kanta laga for Remix barons
(The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 as notified in official gazette on 08th June, 2012)
 The chaos of ‘kanta laga’ has been over but the beat has been listened by the Government very deeply. In latest amendment we can see a complete wrath over the remixes or technically the version recordings flourished in India. 

The time of 2003 – 2010 has witnessed a sheer pressure of remixes in Indian music industries, where the singers have declared the remix version as the near nude dancers and remixes said we added masala to the song.

The remixes, termed as “version recordings” meant by a sound recording made of any already published song by using another voice or voices and with different musicians and arrangers. Version recording is thus neither copying not reproduction of the original recordings. [See Gramophone Co. of India v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., 1996 PTC(16)].

The only remedy available with the original musicians are available is the compliance of condition under Section 52 (1)(j) (prior to the amendments) which were not more than the formalities required under Copyright Act, 1957. In other words, judiciary has nodded indirectly to the remixes.

However, in the Copyright (Amendment) Ac, 2012 new Section 31C has been inserted keeping in view to protect the right of the musicians and singers and to curb the infringement of copyright through the version recordings/remixes.
The important aspects of Section 31C are as follows:
1.      Consent or license from the owner of the right in any literary, dramatic or musical work and the cover version shall be in same medium as was lastly used until the medium has been outdated in commercial use.
2.      Prior written notice to the owner for version recording is required and the royalty shall be paid in advance at the rate as specified by the Copyright Board and for a minimum of 50000 copies.
3.      A cover version cannot be reproduced until the expiration of 5 years from the date it was actually made.
4.      Cover version shall have to mention that it is a cover version and shall not contain he name or depict in anyway any performer of an earlier sound recording of the same work or any cinematographic film in which such recording was incorporated.
5.      A person cannot make any alteration in the literary or musical work which has not been made previously by or with consent of the actual owner of the rights.
6.  Alteration in original recordings are only allowed for technical purpose now, however, previously it was allowed for adaption of the work.
The amendment on one hand has protected the original owners and on other hand restricted the Kolaveri singers to get outshine in one day….

Sunday, 10 March 2013

Legal threat for violation of trademark


Section 142 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
142. Groundless threats of legal proceedings.-
(1) Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first- mentioned erson to be registered, or with some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark, bring a suit against the first- mentioned person and may obtain a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustifiable, and an injunction against the continuance of the threats and may recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first- mentioned person satisfies the court that the rade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened, constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark.
(2) The last preceding sub- section does not apply if the registered proprietor of the trade mark, or a registered user acting in pursuance of sub- section (1) of section 52 with due diligence commences and the trade mark. prosecutes an action against the person threatene for infringement of
(3) Nothing in this section shall render a legal practitioner or a registered trade marks agent liable to an action under this section in respect of an act done by him in his professional capacity on behalf of a client.
(4) A suit under sub- section (1) shall not be instituted in any court inferior to a District Court.

Saturday, 9 March 2013

Procedure for Opposition to Trademarks

Opposition to the Trademarks
(Section 21 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Rules 47-57)

Section 20 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 provides that an application for registration of a trademark being accepted by the Registrar either absolutely or subject to any condition or limitation thereon, the Registrar shall advertise the same in the Journal of the Trademarks.

After the publication of the trademark in the journal any person aggrieved a apply to the Registrar of Trademark for the opposition under section 21 of the Trademark Act,1999.

Procedure for the opposition:

Notice for Opposition (Rule 47 and 48)

As per Section 21(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1999:
·         Any person;
·         Within four months from the date of advertisement of application in Trademark journal. However, an extension of the period under which the notice for the opposition to the Registrar may be given under Section 21 can be taken by applying under Rule 47(6) in TM-44 alongwith a fee of Rs. 500/-.

·         Give notice in writing under TM-5 in Triplicate alongwith fee of Rs. 2,500/- (Rule 47) for opposition to the Registrar of Trademark

The Registrar of the Trademarks under Section 21(2) shall serve a copy of the notice of opposition to the applicant as soon as it received by the Registrar.

Counter Statement to the notice of the Opposition (Rule 49)

The applicant shall within 2 months from the date of receipt of any Notice for Opposition may file the counter-statement for the said notice to the Registrar. The Counter Statement can be made in form TM-6 in Triplicate alongwith a fee of Rs. 1,000/- to the Registrar. (in case of non-submission the same shall be taken as abandoned)
Submission of Evidence by the opponent to the Registrar (Rule 50):

The Opponent as per Rule 50 of the Trademarks Rules:
·         Within 2 months from the date of service of counter statement or 1 month extension if approved by the Registrar
·         May adduce evidence alongwith affidavit in support of the opposition; or  shall intimate to the Registrar and to applicant in writing that that opponent does not desire to adduce any evidence in support of his evidence but intends to reply upon facts stated in the notice of opposition

After receiving the evidence the applicant also get the opportunity to file evidence against the opponent in the same manner as granted to the opponent.

The applicant as well as the opponent may apply to the Registrar for the extension of 1 month as mentioned above for adducing the evidence in Form TM-56 alongwith fee of Rs. 500/- within two month from the date of the service of the notice or the service of the evidence adduced by the Opponent or the Applicant or vice-versa.

Evidence in reply by opponent

The opponent within 1 month after the date of receiving the copy of evidence from the applicant in his counter statement may submit to the Registrar evidence with affidavit and shall deliver the same to the Applicant.

Hearing by the Registrar

The Registrar within 3 months from the date of completion of evidence may give notice to the parties of the first date of hearing. Usually the date of hearing will be for a date atleast one month after the date of first notice. If the parties have exhibits then the copy of the same shall be produced with an affidavit before the Registrar of Trademarks.

The Parties within 14 days from the receipt of the notice of the hearing in Form TM-7 alongwith fee of Rs. 500/- shall intimate to the Registrar about the intention of attending the hearing.

Effect of Non-appearance on the date of hearing:

·         If applicant is not present at the date of hearing and has not intimated under TM-7 then the application shall be abandoned until sufficient cause produced by Applicant under Rule 56(2).
·         If opponent is not present at the date of hearing and has not intimated under TM-7 then opposition shall stands dismissed and TM will be registered.

Note: Specifically as per Rule 56(6) the fact that the agent or advocate on record of a party is engaged in another court shall not be a ground for adjournment of the hearing.

For any query or clarification please mail to naveen4567.shreel@gmail.com.


The content above produced are subjected to change in laws for the time being in force. The author shall not be liable for any damages of whosoever caused to any person acting solely on the information provided here. 

Extension of Trademark Hearing

Public Notice- Adjournment of hearings related to trademark scheduled between 17/03/2020 to 15/04/2020 In view of advisory issued by M...